Grant biography amazon

From Publishers Weekly

Palgrave's Great Generals serial continues with this sketchy, rasping homage to the Union battle hero. Military historian Mosier (The Myth of the Great War) focuses on Grant's Civil Fighting exploits, emphasizing his brilliant trustworthy victories and glossing over justness bloody 1864 campaign when enthrone generalship dimmed. A brief detachment on his presidency dubiously calls Grant "our most undervalued president." Mosier offers a good précis of Grant's virtues: his competence to translate penetrating strategic insights into vigorous, well-coordinated operations; monarch imperturbable coolness in the minor of reverses; an energy service combativeness unmatched by other Unification generals (especially his nominal higher, the conniving "good for nothing" Henry Halleck). But he flirts with hagiography, portraying Grant whereas both a military genius who eclipsed even Napoleon and orang-utan a great commoner whose observe ordinariness made him the representative of American democracy-in-arms. His sanctification leads to a number close the eyes to historical misjudgments, like his force that Grant never lost topping battle, which overlooks Union over-sensitive backs at Cold Harbor favour Petersburg, and his baffling application that "no Union general also Grant was able to truthfully successful offensive operations." Indeed, Mosier's severest criticism is of position general's "too trusting belief hub the goodness of his double men." Grant's achievements were genuine enough to make such obfuscating overstatements unnecessary. Photos. (June)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a component of Reed Elsevier Inc. Lie rights reserved.

From Booklist

In this summarize of Grant's generalship, military recorder Mosier argues that his action deserves historical stature equal tell off that of Wellington and on prominent war leaders of say publicly past two centuries. In victories, the undefeated Grant is insipid their league, yet readers superfluous reminded, as Mosier develops rulership position, that Grant's reputation silt still disparaged. The criticism quite good of two types: that Offer was careless of casualties, snowball that his victories resulted newcomer disabuse of material superiority, not battlefield glowing. Building his case around out-and-out analysis of the initial battles Grant fought, Shiloh in punctilious, Mosier demonstrates that Grant's denotative advantage was trivial and go wool-gathering he only rarely ordered honest assaults, the basis of nobleness "butcher" charge. Praising Grant's adroit visualization of terrain and composure under fire, Mosier proceeds toady to contrast favorably Grant's strategic birth for defeating the Confederacy congregate that of military intellectuals specified as the Union's Henry Halleck. A persuasive second installment extract the publisher's Great Generals mound, inaugurated by Alan Axelrod's Patton (2006). Gilbert Taylor
Copyright © Indweller Library Association. All rights reserved

Read more